Attribution. The seed of change

Attriubution of any given action to any given media event is at the heart of budget allocation in the online world. ‘Last click’ is a simple measure with a pleasant binary quality about. The action followed the click therefore the click caused the action.

We all  know that it is not as simple as that. My boss, Irwin Gotlieb, has said a number of times that ‘if the first time someone sees an ad for Mercedes Benz is the first time he can afford one (and is in market), then it’s probably too late. Sadly there is no published anthology of Irwinian thought but I am sure this one would make the cut.

Irwin’s point is that there are two issues going on here: the first concerns understanding the long term effect of marketing and the short term effect, the second is about how we value different contact types and outcomes.

The sad truth is that right now there is no sound process for understanding these dynamics. In the online world the best effort to date has been made by the excellent folk at the Atlas Institute and their Engagement Mapping work but this work has two flaws. First it is not a currency, second it is run by a unit of Microsoft who, rightly or wrongly, are not considered an independent voice.

The industry (and Microsoft Ad sales) would be well served if Microsoft separated the Atlas Institute from the parent’s ownership and placed in the hands of a joint industry group funding by sellers, advertisers and agencies. Under that ownership the chance for the work to growin authority and scope would increase.

If that happened it is likely that the split in the market between search and display would begin to change and that the vendor community could get a clearer view of the real value of its inventory. In turn this will impact ad networks, affilate programs and others whose main concern is understanding how the contribute to the decisive action.

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

4 responses to “Attribution. The seed of change

  1. Excellent post!

    One flaw though…there actually is a solution (which may pique your interest).

    C3 Metrics

    Download the 35 pager white paper from the home page:

    http://c3Metrics.com

  2. Hi Rob,

    Awesome post!

    One piece of news, though.

    There is an alternative to the product from Atlas…C3 Metrics.

    Ten times easier to use, far more affordable, and I will leave it to your judgement as to whether it’s in fact better.

    You can download the 35 page White Paper directly from the home page of C3.

    http://c3Metrics.com

  3. Eyeblaster are also doing some great work with path to conversion mapping. Their Channel Connect tool tags all forms of digital marketing and attributes a value to each channel that has contributed to an end conversion.

    The insights that have come from this tool have helped clients move away from a ‘last click wins’ model and towards a more holistic view of the contribution of each online channel.

    An piece of econometric modelling can then build a picture of the contributions that offline activity make towards online conversions.

  4. Pingback: Solving The Great Attribution Debate « Strategy 403

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s